The Strange Death of James Farrell

 This episode’s audio file may be found at http://www.utahhumanities.org/BeehiveArchive.htm.
© 2008 Utah Humanities Council

 

The Script:

 

A little more than 112 years ago, an Irish immigrant named James Farrell was found dead in his home at the corner of Ninth West and Third South in Salt Lake.  A brickmaker by trade, Farrell was a relative newcomer to Utah, having moved to Salt Lake from Omaha only six or seven years before.  Before that, he had lived in Chicago where he became a US citizen in 1884.  He lived alone, but he appears to have made friends with some of the children in his neighborhood.  It was one of those children that found his lifeless body and called for a doctor.

 

Workers and immigrants from the 19th century—people like James Farrell—are notoriously hard to track in historical sources, in part because they tended to leave relatively few personal records behind for historians to use.  Farrell, however, is unique.  He owned his house and the property it stood on.  More amazing still, he left $1,500 in a bank account and a $120 insurance policy when he died, astronomical sums when one considers that in 1896 the average hourly wage in the manufacturing sector was less than 20 cents.  The result of Farrell’s good fortune when he was alive led to a knock-down, drag-out conflict over who would be the administrator of his estate.  The insurance company petitioned to have its representative named as executor, a request that was met with a counterpetition by a woman named Ann Cummings who claimed to be the dead man’s cousin.  Alleging that Cummings was nothing more than an impostor, the insurance company finally won out, but not before the Farrell estate case dragged out over several months.  In the end, James Farrell, a modest immigrant brickmaker, had posthumously captured the Salt Lake headlines with his paradoxical fortune.

 

Sources:

 

See news reports about Farrell in the following 1896 editions of the Salt Lake Tribune:  February 10, February 12, February 18, March 22, and April 29.  Also see the February 15, 1896, edition of the Deseret News.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s